That's a lot going on in that theory.... Lots of moving parts.
And it's in those moving parts (many of whom are conscious having easily tempted humans) that I have the hardest time swallowing what's an otherwise perfectly set up supper of insanity.
It isn't really much of a stretch for me (granted, I might be a little hyper paranoid) to believe that this Administration (much like the Clinton and Bush administrations before it) had no problem capitalizing on tragedy. Tears and suffering are the lifeblood of Washington, fear their new favorite selling point to get anything past the American people. And the idea that the same bunch of political hacks who dreamed up (and subsequently fucked up) the Fast and Furious guns for the cartels scheme as a way to have Americans let go their iron grip on the Second Amendment plotting to pretend a school got shot up to really twist the knife is plausible (this is what happens, by the way, when you get caught actually pulling Conspiracy Theory shit, like the IRS and Benghazi scandals).
And for the sake of this little mental exercise, let's just go along with it.
Obama and Holder dream up this twisted idea to stage an event where kids were murdered the Friday before Christmas vacation. But to pull something this elaborate off, they would need willing accomplices. Now, if it was a riot or protest, Barry could just pick up that phone of his we have heard so much about and issue marching orders for his rent-mobs; his legions of mind numbed Obamaites holding baited breathes for their Messiah to beacon for them. But the acolytes needed to pull off something like this can't just be the run of the mill types... They need to be Newtown, Connecticut law enforcement and EMS officials. And these guys- sworn to protect the citizens of Newtown- need to be willing to "go along" with the event. The whole operation would be depending on their scrutiny and discretion, never being able to risk even a rumor of this having gone down.
The rest of this stuff Halbig asks about- the classifications, the unusual odds and ends on the day of the incident and in the investigation following, the threats- I could swallow that.
But it's this keeping of the mouths shut by the players that always blows these theories up for me... From JFK on through...
And this one is no different.
Even if you take this to the next level beyond the sort of madness it would have taken to fake this... Go so far as to suppose this was actually carried out, though not by the patsy Lanza (who was so pudding brained, he could carry the gear, make the drive, nor fire off the shots with the speed and accuracy he is said to have done this in) but by professionals hired to do the job, thus keeping the local cops off the "Need to Know" list... Even then, you still have a small army of Federal Authorities that you are expecting to remain loyal in world where there is no ceiling to the sort of money a story this juicy could bring the whistleblower daring enough to bring down a President with his testimony.
The President signing off on the slaughter of children for political gain... Makes Nixon look like a piker!
And you don't need dozens to come pouring out to shine this light on the truth... You only need one to come forward.
And it's in that man's absence, my doubts arise.
But that's just me. Listen to the interview, ponder the questions, and let that brain of yours chew these things over for a few minutes.
(And again, if you wonder why something as silly as this is gaining the modicum of traction that it is, feel free to thank Lord Barrack. His vindictive policies towards political opposition and unscrupulous activities and flagrant abuses of the NSA, EPA, and IRS agencies.)
- << Prev